Remember Lost password?
Blog  |  Company  |  News  |  Contact  |  Support   Customer Login
HiConversion
  1.866.251.4335
Contact Us
HiConversion
  • Increasing Conversion is NOT Reducing Bounces

    29 October, 2009 | Author: CJ Boguszewski | My profile on Hiconversion

    With Google Website Optimizer releasing new features and announcing them at eMetrics in Washington, DC, there seems to be a growing cadre of Conversion Optimization specialists prepared to use this tool to drive website Conversion Rate Optimization (CRO). Is that really a good idea? Let’s investigate how this translates into practice, using a recent blog post as an example.

    Conversion Rate Matters More Than How Many Bounces You Get

    Conversion Rate Matters More Than How Many Bounces You Get


    Frequently, I read blog postings by people that take the tone of Google Optimizer – Have You Tried It? This post raises several causes for concern in my mind. Now, please keep in mind that I’m not trying to pick on this posting — what I am doing is using it as an example for what I see as a perception that seems to be widely shared.

    Why does it cause concern? I’ll give you three reasons:

    • With tools like Autonomy (a.k.a. Optimost, Omniture, Adobe), Vertster, and Hiconversion leading the way in conversion rate optimization (CRO) on websites, Google Website Optimizer seems to fall into the category of “free is not cheap enough.” Of course, since Google is pervasive, it gets used by lots of websites, but considering that most only use it for A/B testing (as the above post mentions, not to pick on it but it was a post yesterday that came to my attention) and the traffic level required is extremely high, this makes it difficult to use for most websites doing business on the web today.

    • Google Website Optimizer is not necessarily going to help educate the market. Take, again, yesterday’s post as a common example – the focus seems to be on traffic, and bounce rates. That feels like the tip of a very large iceberg. One might be tempted to say, “Good start.” But what is the site’s conversion rate? There’s no evidence that anyone has worked out that, for every 100 site visitors that come to the shopping cart, 3 click “purchase.” The field “Est. Conv. Rate” on the Google Website Optimizer screen in the blog post has nothing to do with that, as far as I can tell. The only evidence frequently offered has to do with reducing bounce rates. Websites are not billboards, they’re stores. The name of the game is to make money.

    • Analysis is good, but it’s expensive and requires specialists. Again, if you’re not a statistician, do you really understand how multi-variate testing delivers much more impact than A/B testing? or how you have to set up the test to ensure the variations will produce reliable results? or what you’d have to be looking for in your analytics reports (and how to set those up…)? Again, Google Website Optimizer can be quite misleading when it’s in the wrong hands.

    What do you think? Is “free” cheap enough? Do business think conversion rate is about how many people buy, or reducing your bounce rate? Comments welcome.


    • Hello,

      This post just came to my attention and being the author of the blog you refer to, I would like to address it.
      Firstly, I would like to say that I agree with you. There are much more complete tools out there than Google Website Optimizer and if you are looking for a very detailed analysis, you might want to consider other options.
      Secondly, I would like to add that the only goal of that campaign was to reduce bounce rate. This is the first step and most urgent thing that needed to be fixed on that website. Google Website Optimizer seemed good enough for that. We set up any other page than the home page as a conversion and tested different versions of the home page. He had a huge rotating banner made in flash that took over the whole screen and forced people to scroll down quite some ways. We tried adding more obvious link on top of that banner, and tried getting rid of the banner, and we tried to get rid of the banner and drop down menu. For a basic experiment like this one, I believe is was enough to let us know how many people went to another page after landing on a specific home page.
      Of course, it doesn't tell us how many ended up being from that site, or sending a request for quote, because we were not there yet. If people don't go to another page, we know that they won't buy anything for sure.

      I hope it makes more sense now. Again, I agree with you but in this case, Google Website Optimizer was enough for what we wanted to test.
    blog comments powered by Disqus



    Copyright© 2006-2010 Hiconversion, Inc. All rights reserved.      Legal Notice | Privacy Statement | Security Statement | Submission Guidelines | Site Feedback